What if the impending United States-led raid on Syria is not meant to be a response to the chemical weapons attack? What if the chemical weapons attack is a ruse for commencing a needless war? In 2009, the Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in cahoots with prime ministers of four other countries, masterminded a stratagem for dwindling Russia’s large amount of customers and wide base of control in the European oil market. Qatar wanted to construct a natural gasoline pipeline, beginning in the Gulf and stretching out into Turkey, and with the Nabucco pipeline project, diversify natural gasoline purveyors and shipment itineraries amongst Europe with the exclusion of Russia. Two different options were proposed for the directions in which the pipeline would go. Option one included the point of origin being in Qatar and extending through Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq and Turkey; whereas, the second option included Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey. Coincidentally enough, the hegemonic orchestrators behind this impending war are bringing these countries onto the battlefield with Syria being the focal point.
Since the Nabucco pipeline project failed miserably, everyone’s focus has shifted since 2009. Vladamir Putin is still quite angry about the stratagem that was planned against his country in 2009 and is striving to oppose the United States and Qatar that have accoutered the Syrian insurgents with 3 billion dollars worth of paraphernalia for toppling Assad’s regime so Qatar can afterwards install a new tyrant who will allow Qatar to build a pipeline that will sell much gasoline to Europe and expand their earnings with the exclusion of Russia. Vladamir Putin’s country derives crucial and vast earnings from Assad and his oil reserves. Without Assad in power, Vladimir Putin’s country cannot flourish as much.
Why else does the United States government want to begin war with Syria? The British news outlet known as the Guardian discussed the American government’s current deliberation for assailment against Syria as originating from the American government’s desire for warring against “Iranian influence across the Middle East,” a desire that birthed itself long prior to the current chemical weapons crisis.
The Bush administration’s CIA-directed promulgation of false information against Iran during May of 2007 also included maneuvering CIA-directed attacks against Syria. Under the guidance of the United States, Saudi Arabia dispatched funds and logistical aid for prostrating Bashar Al-Assad’s regime and having him capitulate to Israel’s demands. The United States had stealthily given political and financial assistance to the Muslim Brotherhood via the Saudi Arabian government.
For the past number of years, a former NATO Secretary and Supreme Commander, named Wesley Clark, has been sharing his story about a memorandum he discovered being sent from the Office of the US Secretary of Defense a few weeks after the September 11th terrorist attacks detailing how America would invade and undermine Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran within the next five years. Clark proclaims all of this is being orchestrated for the purpose of seizing control over the oil and gasoline resources in these countries. According to Clark, $150 billion is annually spent on wars waged for the procurement of oil. Half of the $600 billion defense budget is spent on the establishment of troops in areas where access to oil and gasoline supplies must be protected.
It appears as though our government officials’ avidity for war and hope for Bashar Al-Assad to be intransigent and refuse to relent can be realized or inferred about from what Russia Today reported more than a week ago. A number of press reports have discussed the Syrian government expressing a desire for ceding their stockpile of chemical weapons to the community of "international control", but John Kerry and the State Department are disbelieving this and are saying Bashar Al-Assad would never behave so complaisantly. Ten days ago, John Kerry publicly shared his desired ultimatum for Syria to surrender their weapons or be attacked, but then later the State Department “stressed that Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the one-week deadline and unlikelihood of Assad turning over Syria's chemical weapons stockpile.”
Israel in the Driver’s Seat
Aside from our politicians, who else wants America to begin war with Syria? Could it be the foreign countries we are allied with?
The interviewee of this video, Michael Scheuer, is a historian and former CIA sleuth who, for three years, spearheaded the military intelligence and surveillance unit following after Osama Bin Laden’s footsteps from the CIA’s counter terrorism center. In this video he discusses America’s impending intervention in Syria being fundamentally intended for augmenting the geopolitical power of the foreign governments who have a stranglehold on the United States government.
All Islamic forces that America brands as foes are currently colliding with explosive force and the intent of murdering each other, and while doing so, this internecine inter-factional warfare will be used to bolster the leverage of the world's imperialists and private bankers who are employing ideals of perverted internationalism and cosmopolitanism for structuring and building their New World Order from the chaos. Barack Obama’s deferment of America’s military onslaught against Syria and his choice to solicit Congress for approval first is purposed for giving ample time to the Israeli lobbyists of our country to travel from coast to coast and negotiate with congressional officials to vote in support of our pseudo-humanitarian president and our crypto-hegemony in foreign lands. The wiles for luring American congressional officials into machination with the Israeli lobbyists include campaign contribution venality and threats of using the Zionist-endorsed, Israeli-owned mainstream media to sway public opinion against the insubordinate politicians so they may be divested of their political careers.
America is seeking to wage war against Syria with the hope of Iran hastening to Syria’s defense so America will be given a pretext for warring with Iran. When John McCain speaks of America facing a national security predicament and being in need of retaliating, the predicament is not pertaining to American soil, but rather is pertaining to Israeli soil. Any concern we have for Israel being catastrophically affected will prompt the United States into warring for Israel’s defense at a moment’s notice. America’s allegiance to Israel is so unwavering that our nation can be either bribed or coerced into supporting and warring for Israel with whatever level of immediacy Israel demands.
The Saudi Arabian government officials who have significant investments in our debts and properties have been negotiating with U.S.-affiliated munitions corporations to acquire more vessels and defense materials. The lobbyists of the Saudi Arabian-syndicated and U.S.-affiliated munitions corporations are wheedling and intimidating American congressional officials into becoming auxiliary executors of their bloodthirsty imperialism as well.
The World’s Banking Elites in the Driver’s Seat
Who else wants America to go to war with Syria? Could it be the usurious loan-issuers of the privatized fiat monetary system who are enslaving countries with the war-loans they give? Is the current Syrian crisis traceable to the United States Treasury and Wall Street-instigated $700 trillion derivatives scandal of the 1990s; a time during when banking deregulations and the derivatives market accreted worldwide with the Financial Services Agreement of the international free-trade agreements superintended by the World Trade Organization being a facilitator? It was used for prying open the markets of all nations to become permeable to toxic assets and derivatives being sold to them by Citibank, JP Morgan and every other high-ranking Wall Street bank. Whatever nation the United States saw as being seducible, it preyed upon and strived to have every barrier removed for consolidating commercial and investment banking so depositor’s funds could be accessible for on-the-market trades and derivatives gambling. The abolition of the Glass Steagall Act made this possible. The United States began negotiating with countries that were non-members of the World Trade Organization and beleaguering the nations that resisted membership, most notably Islamic nations such as Iran, Libya, Iraq and Syria, that have banks functioning under the state to apportion credit and funds amongst the public to circulate synchronistically with the flow of economic needs, labor and production of the people instead of having central banks being lorded over by oligarchs of private finance to whom the people slavishly owe usury-polluted payments.
